I just flew back from Holland, and boy are my arms tired.
Actually, not my arms. My head — from reading the local press over there. Dutch journalists are another reason to love America, and I say that having frequently skewered my U.S. colleagues for their sad lack of a backbone vis-a-vis the administration during the dark era of 2001-2005.
In any case, during my ten-day visit, my inner curmudgeon was constantly baffled by Dutch magazines and newspapers, most of which seemed characterized by laziness and frivolity.
For instance, one usually fairly respectable paper thought it'd be cute to hire two poets for a day, whose task it was to make all the headlines rhyme. Seriously. Granted, this was on St. Nicholas Day, when the Dutch give each other presents that are often accompanied by home-made poems, but regardless — predictably enough, it turned out to be a profoundly annoying chore to read that day's edition. Top-notch headline-writing is a precious skill under the best of circumstances; requiring headlines to rhyme is an exercise in silliness and confusion, both of which were delivered with clueless aplomb.
More importantly, a perpetual habit of the Dutch press is to skimp on reportorial effort. If ink-stained wretches over yonder feel they can write an article on a complex issue using just two sources, nothing and no one compels them to pick up the phone a third or fifth or tenth time. More often than not, Dutch news reports are thinner than Lindsay Lohan on a hunger strike. And more often than not, by generating as many questions as they answer, they leave the reader in the lurch.
Grammar and clarity weren't exactly stellar either, but I was struck even more by Dutch journalists' increasingly tenuous math skills. The country's largest news and opinion magazine carried an article about how the Earth's number of trees will supposedly grow by two percent a year over the next decade and a half, which, the writer informed us, meant a total of 30 percent. Apparently, he'd never heard of compounding (it's not a linear increase; two percent, compounding over 15 years, isn't 30 but almost 35 percent). Yeah, that's a niggle, I guess, but plenty such niggles presented themselves unbidden.
On the positive side, image choice and photo reproduction in the broadsheets is as good as ever (on the whole better than in the U.S.), and the country's paper of record, NRC Handelsblad, is surely one of the most handsome-looking newsprint products in the world. The triumphant quasi-feminist blather of its brand new editor-in-chief, the first woman so appointed, was a bit much (who on earth cares whether an editor has a penis or a vagina?), but whatever — congratulations to her, and best of luck.
Also, although Dutch news writers still possess the maddening habit of telling readers what to think, the mixing of fact and opinion is now perhaps less pronounced than before.
Readers nostalgic for the traditional sour, fingerwagging tone of many a Dutch news report could always turn to the U.K. Guardian. There, they might find the world explained to them in comforting terms: capitalism bad, socialism good, boo-hiss to America, long live welfare, soak the rich, etc. etc. Yes, I'm exaggerating, but not by much. Take Amelia Hill (please), the Guardian's culture and society correspondent. Yesterday she began an article as follows:
No whim is too ridiculous. No extravagance out of reach. Stratospheric City bonuses announced last week and an influx of international financiers have created a fresh echelon of British super-rich living lives of unheard of affluence. In what has been termed the 'Marie Antoinette' syndrome, this breed of the mega-wealthy inhabit a world of riches reminiscent of the French royal court just before the revolution.
And on and on, with purple prose that leaves little doubt as to what she would like to do with a guillotine and a stake. Astonishing.
I must admit that the Dutch press, by comparison, is a model of Keynesian restraint, and if lowland-dwelling editors are on occasion oddly compelled to rhyme and to mess up their math, well, in the spirit of the holidays, I'll say there are worse things.
Recent Comments