Catholics in Oklahoma are consumed with passion and wracked with doubt over the latest scandal in the Catholic Church. So they're finally expressing outrage over priests diddling little boys, right?
No, actually. Their soul-searching focuses on the son of God's ginormous wang.
[A] controversial crucifix has caused a deep divide among members of St. Charles Borromeo Catholic Church, where it hangs above the main altar. "There are a couple people who have left the parish,” said the Rev. Philip Seeton, the church’s pastor. "There are people in the parish who don’t like it and have stayed." Critics of the crucifix take issue with what appears to be a large penis covering Jesus’ abdominal area. Seeton said the portion of the crucifix in question is meant to be Jesus’ abdomen "showing distension" — not a penis.
Seeton said, "I’ve had people who have vocally said that that’s what they see there. I’ve had people who have been just as vocal who said that’s not what they're seeing there." Janet Jaime, a local iconography artist who designed the crucifix, had no comment. "I think it was painted according to the certain specific rules of iconography and church art,” Seeton said of the crucifix.
Hell-arious. Apparently, if you're a (pardon me) member of the church, any time is a good time to work yourself into a lather over Christ's cock.
You'd think that catholics were obsessed wouldn't you?
http://www.jesusoftheweek.com/jesii/565/index.html
Posted by: Steve R | Friday, April 16, 2010 at 03:27 AM
Reminds me of Dee Snider in front of Congress:
"As the creator of "Under the Blade," I can say categorically that the only sadomasochism, bondage, and rape in this song is in the mind of Ms. Gore."
Posted by: Phelps | Friday, April 16, 2010 at 01:31 PM
Charlemagne received the foreskin as a wedding gift.
Unbelievably retarded.
Many humans are STILL distressingly unevolved and animalistic.
Posted by: Don | Tuesday, April 20, 2010 at 07:34 AM